A cargo vessel carrying several thousand new cars capsized on Sunday off the coast of Georgia, and four crew members are missing.
According to Reuters, Hyundai and Kia vehicles were the cargo on board; the Korea Herald said the vehicles were headed to the Middle East for export and that some were Kia Motors cars while others were from “other global carmakers.“
The Coast Guard is continuing rescue efforts today.
UPDATE 9/9/19, 11: 55 a.m.: The Associated Press is reporting that the Coast Guard has located and contacted the four missing crew members in the capsized Golden Ray cargo ship. Coast Guard rescuers drilled a hole through the ship’s hull, through which they are talking to the crew who are “on board and OK” according to the news report. They are now figuring out how to get the four crew members out safely.
A massive cargo ship potentially carrying over 4000 new vehicles capsized in Saint Simons Sound near the Port of Brunswick in Georgia early Sunday morning.
The M/V Golden Ray is a vehicle cargo vessel that local news reports say was carrying 4200 vehicles as it left the harbor on its way to Baltimore. Reuters is reporting that they were Hyundai and Kia vehicles; we have reached out to the automaker, which is preparing a statement.
For reasons not yet understood, the ship turned and fell on its port side before making it to the open ocean. There were 24 people on board when it fell sideways into the water: 23 crew members and one pilot. The U.S. Coast Guard rescued 20 of the crew members before rescuers noticed a fire with black smoke coming out of the cargo hold and decided it was too dangerous to attempt further efforts. Four people remain unaccounted for. As of Sunday afternoon, there was no active release of pollution, the Coast Guard said, but it and other agencies are monitoring the situation. The question of the ship’s stability is an ongoing investigation, according to the Coast Guard.
Automakers have dealt with the loss of an entire ship’s worth of vehicles before. In 2006, as Car and Driver reported, a cargo ship called the Cougar Ace capsized when it was near Alaska on a journey from Asia to North America with $103 million worth of brand-new Mazdas on board. The 23-member crew needed to be rescued, and all 4703 cars were eventually crushed.
The Golden Ray was built in 2017 and was sailing under the flag of the Marshall Islands. It has the capacity to carry 6933 vehicles and is owned by GL NV24 Shipping and operated by Hyundai Glovis. Both companies are based in Seoul, South Korea. Rescue efforts are ongoing.
Star Felicity Huffman was sentenced to 14 days in jail on Friday for her function in the college admissions scandal, after federal district attorneys argued that some period of imprisonment was essential to send a message that fortunate moms and dads would be “similarly subject to the law despite wealth or position.”
Huffman, 56, pleaded guilty in May to conspiracy to dedicate mail scams and sincere services mail fraud for paying $15,000 to have a proctor remedy her eldest daughter’s SAT responses in2017 In federal court in Boston on Friday, Huffman sobbed as she apologized to her daughter, who she says was not knowledgeable about the unfaithful scheme.
” I was frightened. I was silly, and I was so incorrect. I am deeply ashamed of what I have done,” Huffman said, according to the Associated Press. “I have actually inflicted more damage than I might ever picture. I now see all the things that led me down this road, however ultimately none of the reasons matter because at the end of the day I had a choice. I could have stated no.”
Huffman had actually thought about pursuing the same scheme for her younger child, however eventually decided against it.
The Brief Newsletter
Indication up to get the top stories you need to know right now. View Sample
Federal district attorneys argued that imprisonment was “the only meaningful sanction for these criminal offenses,” and had actually asked that Huffman get a one-month jail sentence and $20,000 fine. Instead, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani sentenced her to 14 days in prison, 250 hours of community service, a year of monitored release and a fine of $30,000
Huffman is the very first of more than 30 moms and dads to be sentenced for their function in assisting in unfaithful and bribing athletic coaches to get their children into elite schools. In the months given that prosecutors revealed criminal charges against 51 individuals, observers had questioned whether any of the offenders would serve time in jail. In June, previous Stanford sailing coach John Vandemoer, the first person associated with the scandal to be sentenced, received no prison time.
One complicating factor has actually been a legal dispute over whether any victim suffered a monetary loss as a result of the bribery scheme– which might impact how lenient the sentences are. Federal probation officers, in conflict with prosecutors, concluded in a report this week that there was no victim of Huffman’s crime.
In a letter to Talwani recently, Huffman stated there was “no validation for what I have done,” however explained that her “desperation to be an excellent mother” drove her to horn in her daughter’s test rating.
” I talked myself into thinking that all I was doing was offering my daughter a fair shot. I see the irony in that declaration now because what I have done is the opposite of reasonable,” she composed. “I have actually broken the law, deceived the educational community, betrayed my daughter, and failed my household.”
The charges against Huffman and other parents– amidst anticipation that they might receive lax sentences– have fueled discussions about racial and socioeconomic inequality in the criminal justice system and fairness in higher education, as those accused of bribing their method into elite schools likewise had access to legal benefits, including private tutors, expensive college counselors and effective connections.
Throughout the sentencing hearing, Talwani reprimanded Huffman for attempting to “get one more advantage” in the college admissions process, a system “currently so distorted by money and opportunity.”
District attorneys referenced the case of Kelley Williams-Bolar, a mom in Akron, Ohio who was founded guilty in 2011 on felony charges connected to registering her daughters for public school under their grandpa’s address in a much better district. She was sentenced to 10 days in prison, 3 years of probation, and fined $70,000 Her conviction was later minimized to a misdemeanor by then-Gov. John Kasich.
” I was a divorced mama, a black mom, residing in an inner-city, just attempting to make my method, trying to go to college, attempting to start over once again, and the justice system didn’t have any mercy on that at all,” Williams-Bolar told TIME today “The justice system is not simply for everybody.”
Huffman’s sentence supplies some insight into what other defendants in the admissions scandal can expect as their cases continue. Talwani kept in mind that Huffman did not involve her kid in the rip-off and paid a smaller sized kickback than many other parents, however she agreed “there must be some imprisonment imposed.”
” The reality that the judge decided to send out among, perhaps, the least culpable offenders to some prison time will let [other defendants] understand that probation may not remain in the cards,” says Doug Berman, a Moritz College of Law teacher who studies criminal sentencing.
Several offenders– including Complete House star Lori Loughlin and her partner Mossimo Giannulli, accused of paying $500,000 to have their daughters designated as crew team hires at the University of Southern California– have pleaded not guilty and are planning to proceed to trial.
They could deal with up to 40 years in prison if convicted.
” One always faces a longer prison term if convicted after a trial, preserving their resistance and revealing no regret,” Berman states. “I make sure there are defense lawyers encouraging clients who have not yet pled guilty that it’s not too late.”
This 77- year-old British yachtswoman broke a world record for oldest individual to sail around the world from The United States and Canada solo, nonstop and unassisted.
Jeanne Socrates reached Royal Victoria Private Yacht Club in Canada on Saturday afternoon flying an orange sail aboard the SV Nereida after just under a year at sea considering that she left on Oct. 3, 2018.
The private yacht club shared pictures and videos of Socrates cruising into port with a flotilla of other boats anxiously waiting in the breakwater and harbor as her solo circumnavigation ended.
Throughout a previous attempt at the same record in 2017, Socrates was forced to stop after she broke her neck and ribs, she described on her website
Socrates, who is from Lymington in Hampshire, documented her months-long journey on a blog site that consisted of pictures, articles and a Google Earth map that tracked her progress during the trip.
Charlotte Kaufman, creator of Ladies Who Cruise, the biggest online group of women sailors in the world, hailed Socrates’ accomplishements.
” I’m honored to understand a great deal of record-breaking sailors and ladies accomplishing fantastic things on the water,” she told ABC News. “Women’s achievements both in the sport and in the market have actually really reached a tipping point in world records and accomplishments,” Kaufman included.
The previous record was held by Minoru Saito, who was 71 when he completed the journey in 2005, according to the Royal Victoria Yacht Club.
Socrates’ 38- foot boat was called after the Nereids, handmaidens of Poseidon, of ancient Greek mythology, according to her blog.
Socrates did not instantly react to ABC News’ ask for comment.
The experienced sailor, who has formerly finished other solo travels, was officially acknowledged by the Guinness Book of World Records as the earliest woman to sail solo, nonstop and unassisted around the world in2013
” In addition to Jeanne’s world record, we have the very first woman to helm an America’s Cup Boat (Carolijn Brouwer for Group Netherlands in 2021), the very first lady and youngest person to go into the Golden World Race (Susie Goodall, 2018), and Lisa Blair [who] holds the records for very first lady to sail solo, continuously, unassisted around Australia (2018) and she’s likewise the first woman to sail solo around Antarctica (2017),” Kaufman described.
OSLO (Reuters) – Swedish teenager Greta Thunberg’s shaming of world leaders and air travelers over climate change has won her millions of admirers and attracted many new followers to her cause.
But it just might cost her the Nobel Peace Prize.
Thunberg, one of few people whose nomination has become known before the awards ceremony, is the bookmakers’ favorite to win the prize next month.
At 16, she would be the youngest recipient of the $930,000 award won by the likes of Nelson Mandela, Jimmy Carter and Mikhail Gorbachev. She would be the first to win the prize for environmental work since former U.S. vice president Al Gore shared it in 2007 for raising awareness of climate change.
But Thunberg’s youth, outspokenness and confrontational approach – the very factors that have made her the global face of climate change activism – present challenging questions for the Norwegian Nobel Committee.
Her shaming of those who choose to travel by airplane – #flightshame – raises hackles among some people. The denunciations of world leaders by a teenager alienates others.
While liberals see her as courageous for telling the truth about climate change, right-wing critics depict her as a liar or hypocrite, suggest her parents have manipulated her or portray her as the ringleader of a socialist conspiracy.
“It’s been a while (since Gore was awarded the prize in 2007) … so that would boost her chances,” Sverre Lodgaard, a deputy member of the award committee from 2003 to 2011, told Reuters.
“The problem is that the principle of ‘flight shame’ brings her chances … down. Shame is not a constructive feeling to bring about change.”
Thunberg, who does not usually take media requests directly, did not immediately respond to requests for comment made through her father, Svante Thunberg, and to an email account set up to handle media queries.
Greta Thunberg has hit back at her critics, denying she is paid for her activism or is being “used” by anyone.
She wrote on Facebook in February that “there is no one ‘behind’ me except for myself. My parents were as far from climate activists as possible before I made them aware of the situation.”
“A VERY HAPPY YOUNG GIRL”
Thunberg rose to global prominence last year by taking time off school to demonstrate outside Swedish parliament about the lack of action to combat climate change. Inspired by her weekly protest, millions of young people protested around the globe last Friday to put pressure on governments to act.
This week, after sailing to New York in a zero-carbon emissions vessel, she accused leaders at the U.N. climate summit of stealing her dreams and childhood with empty words on climate change.
“How dare you?” she asked.
Her comments did not go down well with U.S. President Donald Trump, who has questioned climate science and has challenged every major U.S. regulation aimed at combating climate change.
FILE PHOTO: Swedish activist Greta Thunberg participates in a youth climate change protest in front of the United Nations Headquarters in Manhattan, New York City, New York, U.S., August 30, 2019. REUTERS/Jeenah Moon
Retweeting footage of her speech, he mocked Thunberg by saying: “She seems like a very happy young girl looking forward to a bright and wonderful future. So nice to see!”
Thunberg responded by changing her Twitter biography to: “A very happy young girl looking forward to a bright and wonderful future.”
Trump also suggested he ought to receive the Nobel Peace Prize himself “for a lot of things if they gave it out fairly, which they don’t.”
With Nobel Prize winners inevitably thrust into the spotlight, the committee will consider Thunberg’s age and how a teenager would cope with even more intense public scrutiny than she is already under, Lodgaard said.
Five years ago, Pakistani education activist Malala Yousafzai won the award at the age of 17, but her candidacy was less divisive than Thunberg’s.
“It is a tremendous burden to give a Nobel to a teenager,” said Asle Sveen, author of several books about the prize.
Even so, he and Lodgaard say Thunberg still has a chance of winning.
The award committee could opt to reduce the weight of expectation on Thunberg by sharing the prize between her and someone else, or simply decide her behavior has shown she is mature beyond her years, they said.
“They would have seen and heard her and she would have come across as thoughtful and effective. She could be a very good candidate,” Lodgaard said.
THE DEFINITION OF PEACE
Also possibly counting against Thunberg is a debate in academic circles about whether environmental activism counts towards peace, as defined in Swedish industrialist Alfred Nobel’s will, even though Gore shared his award with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
“The argument ‘for’ is that the science shows we are experiencing a dramatic change of climate and we could have extreme conditions, with consequences in terms of war and refugees,” Sveen said.
“The argument ‘against’ would be: does a prize to the environment fall outside the boundaries of Nobel’s will? This was an argument used when Al Gore and the IPCC won in 2007.”
Apart from Thunberg, other leading possible contenders for the award include Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed for the reconciliation he forged in 2018 with Eritrea.
The neighbors fought a war that killed more than 70,000 people from 1998 to 2000 and failed to implement a 2000 peace deal. Also counting in Abiy’s favor is his lifting of bans against opposition parties, said Henrik Urdal, director of the Peace Research Institute Oslo.
Abiy, who took office in April 2018, is pushing Ethiopia towards new democratic freedoms, though rights groups say more needs to be done to heal wounds after years of government repression.
Reporters Without Borders, or the Committee to Protect Journalists, groups that campaign for freedom of the press, could also be recognised.
Slideshow (3 Images)
“There is very distinctly a case for this in the age of fake news,” said Dan Smith, director of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
Pope Francis, the United Nations Refugee Agency and its head, Filippo Grandi, are also mentioned among possible contenders for the price in recognition of their work towards refugees and as a way to highlight the right to asylum, under pressure in the United States, Europe and elsewhere.
Additional reporting by Maggie Fick in Nairobi, Editing by Timothy Heritage
The UK Royal Navy frigate HMS Montrose has had almost day-to-day conflicts with Iranian forces in the previous 2 months, with 115 unpleasant interactions in the Persian Gulf considering that the start of July, The Times reports, mentioning the ship’s leader.
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has teased the warship, which stopped working to avoid the seizure of a tanker that stays in Iranian custody.
The Iranians have actually likewise apparently sent out drones and fast attack craft within 200 meters of the warship, along with targeted the frigate with rockets, according to the ship’s commander.
HMS Montrose is one of a number of ships taking part in a US-led multinational security operation in the Gulf aimed securing oil tankers and shipping from Iran.
A British warship that defended an oil tanker from Iranian forces however stopped working to conserve another has had 115 conflicts with Iran’s elite Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in the Persian Gulf because July.
Leader Will King, who commands the Royal Navy frigate HMS Montrose currently tasked with safeguarding British interests and escorting ships in the Gulf, told The Times that his ship has been “heavily” tested by the Iranians, which have actually shown a “continuous intent to interfere with or interfere with UK interests in the area.”
HMS Montrose and its crew made worldwide headlines in mid-July when the Duke-class frigate placed itself between approaching IRGC vessels and the BP oil tanker “British Heritage” the Iranian boats are believed of attempting to take. The frigate trained its deck guns on the Iranian gunboats while releasing verbal cautions.
The British warship is equipped with 2 30 mm weapons that are created for fending off little fast-moving boat. The IRGC vessels departed without incident.
A week later on, the UK-flagged Stena Impero, which was sailing unescorted, was taken by the IRGC. HMS Montrose tried to come to the ship’s help, however it showed up too late.
The ship is entrusted with escorting British-flagged ships through the objected to strait to prevent Iran forces, which haven’t seized a UK-flagged ship considering that July 19 when the Stena Impero was taken.
The Iranians have repeatedly mocked the Type 23 frigate for stopping working to conserve the Stena Impero, which remains in Iranian custody, The Times reported. In addition to taunts, the Iranians have actually also consistently sent out gunboats and unmanned air assets to “daunt” the British warship by approaching to within 200 meters. A reporter for The Times personally experienced a few of these activities reporting aboard HMS Montrose.
Iranian forces have even targeted the ship with coastal defenses and cruise missiles, according to the frigate’s captain.
Towards completion of July, the US released an international maritime security effort referred to as Functional Sentinel. This operation is intended to “increase security of and security in essential waterways in the Middle East,” US Central Command revealed at the time.
The relocation followed a string of attacks on industrial shipping vessels, the downing of a United States drone, and the seizure of a tanker flying the British Union Jack– all actions associated to Iran.
The Royal Navy frigate HMS Montrose and the destroyer HMS Duncan were the first British warships to join this objective. The frigate HMS Kent was released to the Gulf in mid-August, and just recently, the Type 45 destroyer HMS Protector was sent to change the Duncan.
It does not look like it now, however struggle makes you better in more ways than one.
3 minutes read.
Viewpoints revealed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
” It’s alright to battle. That’s how you get more powerful.”
That was sensible profession suggestions from … my Pilates instructor. Of course, she was discussing battle and structure physical strength, but the same principle applies to career-building too.
Having a hard time sucks. No question. Sure, we understand it’s an inherent part of life, and even handy for development, but nobody gets up in the morning, crosses their fingers and says, “guy I actually hope I have a hard time today.” And yet here we are, each of us having problem with something or other. So let’s look at the intense side of the struggle, shall we?
Here are three reasons your unwanted visitor called battle is really a good thing.
1. Battle is better for efficiency … ultimately.
Research study reveals that people who deal with an issue by themselves before receiving support in fact carry out much better than people who have not needed to struggle– on the 2nd time they experience a problem.
So if preliminary efficiency is all you appreciate, battle isn’t always going to help you. However if you care about long-term efficiency, as you should, then your struggle will likely pay off.
Scientists called this ” efficient failure.” They say fumbling with a problem early on promoted “hidden efficacy” since it led to much deeper understanding of the problem after having problem with it.
The takeaway? Focusing specifically on initial performance is myopic. Having a hard time trumps relieve in the long run.
2. Battle is a terrible instructor, but a great one.
Individuals find out more when they have a hard time. You probably dislike this as much as I do, however it holds true.
As a career modification coach, I usually see people struggling at frustration level when they’re in a brand-new position of management, have made a profession pivot to a new market, or are making the shift from standard corporate work to entrepreneurship. There’s a huge learning curve, and hence often big initial disappointment, in all of those situations.
Stumbling under the weight of your new duties and feeling disappointed that your herculean efforts are just getting you feeble results? Provide it time. You’re in a deep learning stage.
3. Battle makes you less resistant to attempting something brand-new.
The disappointment we feel when we battle with something makes us more unbiased about alternative solutions. Why? Battle is a kind of feedback that says what you’re doing now isn’t working.
Spinning your wheels with an issue and understanding that your attempts to fix it aren’t working forces you to attempt things you most likely wouldn’t try if things were sailing along efficiently. Perhaps even things you have actually thought of attempting prior to but didn’t wish to.
Battle forces you to reinvent your approach to the issue in a new way because you need to. Nothing else you have actually attempted has actually worked yet.
Comfort zones and tried and true options are fine when your work is a breeze, but the discomfort of battle eventually forces you to believe and do in a different way.
Text description provided by the designers. Longcheer Private yacht Club lies in the Judiaosha of Dapeng Peninsula, Shenzhen, who is 50 kilometers away from the downtown area. It is incredibly popular as a sailing place for it has actually been held lots of global competitions.
This project is to rebuild the luxury yacht club and the dock on the original website. The overall floor location is 55,00 0, including a private club, a 300- room hotel, and an outside sports school. The website owns a 470 m long coastline, however the building will be easily forming a long “wall” which may obstruct the city’s view to the see when it is horizontally organized on this narrow website. Therefore, this style intends to share this lovely seascape between the luxury yacht and the city by keeping both of their view to it.
The plan makes efforts to fit with the website’s north-south height distinction and set most of the volume under the level of unban streets, other than 4 small “structures” with 40 m range between each other, through which individuals can still quickly see the sea. These pavilions present a light image by polygonal plate roofings cantilevered from all sides, they are injecting extending points upon the horizontal long structure, bringing in an undulating horizon. Besides, they supply resting stations to sea audiences.
The primary building listed below the city roadway level is 5 stories with a length of 400 meters, which is bent into 4 sectors in accordance with the coastline. Each 2 terraces belonging to hotel spaces form a rectangular “cell” on the façade. The depth of cell frames is altering, which makes subtle distinctions of sunshine forecast and the reflected picture of the balcony glass between nearby cells. The frame of each cell is made up with light-silver aluminum panels. Inside one cell, the 2 terraces are separated by a double-layer frosted glass which contains lights inside to accomplish a soft and brilliant lighting impact at night.
There is a folding “drifting belt” in between the hotel space part and the public service functions such as clubs, restaurants, bars, etc., which clearly distinguishes the general public area from the private area, and also strengthens the contrast between the cell facade and the large glass curtain wall. The gene of “belt” really comes from the flexing of the building shape on masterplan in addition to the site border. We continue this type of bending from the 5th façade to the primary façade as another of our action to the shape of mountain and sea wave from the environment.
When we set out to the sea from the dock and look back at the private yacht club, the shape of the building shows a modest posture. The general color of the façade is plain and classy with some partial intriguing elements. Seeing from the hill behind it, the green roofing system and blue pavilion seem to be concealed into the mountains and the sea ， showing the respect for nature and people.
Early on a recent Saturday, Cherry Provost, usually a late riser, drove from her home, in Glen Ridge, New Jersey, to Remsenburg, on Long Island. She had come to watch the Dudley Trophy race. The race is the end-of-summer competition for Small Sloops, a type of sailboat built mostly by a single Center Moriches boatmaker from 1908 to 1932. Only about a hundred and fifty were ever made, and each got a number. The families of the local gentry bought them for their children: they were perfect for sailing at low tide in the shallow bays. In the forties, Cherry’s family had owned one. By the time they sold their summer house in the area, in 1986, the boat had long since changed hands. The Southampton Press had recently told the story of a family who had found theirs—No. 96—after searching for sixty-three years. That gave Cherry the idea of looking for hers.
At around eleven o’clock, she arrived at Remsenburg’s main street. “That’s where Ted Gosnell lived, on Basket Neck Lane,” she recalled, pointing. The Gosnell family had owned No. 11. “And that was a restaurant called Leisure Hour Dining Experience.” She used to bike everywhere, she said, on an Iver Johnson: “There were no cars. It was wonderful.” She admitted to an unusually sharp memory. “I’m part of a study at Wake Forest,” she said. “I go into what’s called movie mode. I can still see the scratches on the glass.” Something else occurred to her now, about Ted Gosnell: one summer he’d got a terrible case of poison ivy on his hands and been unable to sail.
Just on time, she pulled up at the Westhampton Yacht Squadron—a bigger building than she remembered—and walked out onto the long dock. It was a sunny day, with the wind from the north. Some sailors were testing the ropes on their SSs, picturesque wooden boats with jibs reminiscent of the craft Max escapes on in “Where the Wild Things Are.”
The dock brought back a flood of new memories. “I stood here in 1954 and watched the houses fall in the water during the hurricane,” Cherry said, adding, “I brought binoculars.” This reminded her of Mrs. Speir (No. 68), who surfed her house down Moriches Bay in the storied hurricane of 1938. “She clung to the roof. It made her quite famous.” Many of Cherry’s memories have a Lemony Snicket quality.
Her family had bought their summer house in 1932, in Remsenburg. Eight years later, on the nearly empty ocean dunes across the bay, they built a “cabaña.” (The middle “a” is pronounced Thurston Howell-broad.) The beams came from torpedoed shipping that had floated ashore. Seven-year-old Cherry hammered, and she shingled. “Chalk the stripe and snap the line!” she sang.
But, twenty years later, a nor’easter blew the cabaña into the bay. The family retreated to the Remsenburg property, and when Cherry drove by she recognized the grape arbors she’d planted almost eighty years ago. A grandson of the playwright Guy Bolton (no SS) pushed her off the high dive at the beach club; when she shoved him off the edge of the pool, he broke his front teeth. “You know what? He started it, and I finished it,” she said.
Back in Moriches Bay, the Small Sloops labored on like resolute wooden ducklings. The race finished. No. 120 beat out Nos. 152, 153, 137, 135, 13, and 125. At two-forty-five, the Small Sloop association convened its annual meeting under a tent. It is a small band of enthusiasts whose estimable goal is to keep the boats sailing generation after generation. (About forty craft are still in sailing condition.) Cherry, carrying a walking staff topped with a bellic carved eagle, introduced herself. The association’s secretary showed her a booklet with the lineage of every SS. She pointed happily to the Rices (No. 5), the Drivers (No. 47), and the Kiddes (No. 115). “I dated Kyle Kidde,” Cherry told the group. “I danced with him on a Saturday night, and by Monday he was in an iron lung.”
The commodore interrupted to say, “The wind has changed. The boats are in danger.” The crowd suddenly had to go.
Cherry’s husband died in 2008. He would have known their boat number, and so would her brother—he captained; she crewed—but he died last year. His wife had letters, maybe even scanned, but . . . long story. Cherry had only her memories. The number 33, imprinted on a cloth mainsail, kept flashing in her brain, but, when she looked up that sloop in the booklet, she saw that its last listed owner was eighty years ago. The boat had likely been turned into a planter or split in half to make a bar or sucked out to sea long ago. Cherry told other stories from that time: affairs, gruesome deaths, hearts sundered by grief. Some kids had robbed the local movie house with a fake gun. She’d fallen off her Iver Johnson and got a concussion. It was four o’clock. Traffic was building. She should really get going. ♦